This is Mil-Std-882E Operating & Support Hazard Analysis (O&SHA).
Back to: Task 205.
The 200-series tasks fall into several natural groups. Task 206 addresses Operating & Support Analysis.
In the full-length session, The Safety Artisan looks at Operating & Support Hazard Analysis, or O&SHA, which is Task 206 in Mil-Std-882E. We explore Task 205’s aim, description, scope and contracting requirements. We also provide value-adding commentary, which explains O&SHA: how to use it with other tasks; how to apply it effectively on different products; and some of the pitfalls to avoid. We refer to other lessons for specific tools and techniques, such as Human Factors analysis methods.
The text from the standard follows:
OPERATING AND SUPPORT HAZARD ANALYSIS
206.1 Purpose. Task 206 is to perform and document an Operating and Support Hazard Analysis (O&SHA) to identify and assess hazards introduced by operational and support activities and procedures; and to evaluate the adequacy of operational and support procedures, facilities, processes, and equipment used to mitigate risks associated with identified hazards.
206.2 Task description. The contractor shall perform and document an O&SHA that typically begins during Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) and builds on system design hazard analyses. The O&SHA shall identify the requirements (or alternatives) needed to eliminate hazards or mitigate the associated risks for hazards that could not be eliminated. The human shall be considered an element of the total system, receiving both inputs and initiating outputs within the analysis.
206.2.1 The O&SHA considers the following:
a. Planned system configuration(s)
b. Facility/installation interfaces to the system
c. Planned operation and support environments
d. Supporting tools or other equipment
e. Operating and support procedures
f. Task sequence, concurrent task effects, and limitations
g. Human factors, regulatory, or contractually specified personnel requirements
h. Potential for unplanned events, including hazards introduced by human errors
i. Past evaluations of related legacy systems and their support operations
206.2.2 At a minimum, the analysis shall identify:
a. Activities involving known hazards; the time periods, approximate frequency, and numbers of personnel involved; and the actions required to minimize risk during these activities.
b. Changes needed in functional or design requirements for system hardware, software, facilities, tooling, or support/test equipment to eliminate hazards or mitigate the associated risks for hazards that could not be eliminated.
c. Requirements for engineered features, devices, and equipment to eliminate hazards or reduce risk.
d. Requirements for Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), to include its limitations.
e. Warnings, cautions, and special emergency procedures.
f. Requirements for packaging, handling, storage, and transportation to eliminate hazards or reduce risk.
g. Requirements for packaging, handling, storage, transportation, and disposal of Hazardous Materials (HAZMAT) and hazardous wastes.
h. Training requirements.
i. Effects of Commercial-Off-the-Shelf (COTS), Government-Off-the-Shelf (GOTS), Government-Furnished Equipment (GFE) and Non-Developmental Item (NDI) hardware and software across interfaces with other system components or subsystems.
j. Potentially hazardous system modes under operator control.
k. Related legacy systems, facilities, and processes which may provide background information relevant to operating and supporting hazard analysis.
206.2.3 If no specific analysis techniques are directed or if the contractor recommends a different technique than the one specified by the Program Manager (PM), the contractor shall obtain PM approval of the technique(s) to be used before performing the analysis.
206.2.4 The contractor shall update the O&SHA following system design or operational changes as necessary.
206.2.5 The contractor shall document the results of the analysis to include the following information:
a. System description. This summary describes the physical and functional characteristics of the system and its subsystems. Reference to more detailed system and subsystem descriptions, including specifications and detailed review documentation, shall be supplied when such documentation is available.
b. Hazard analysis methods and techniques. Provide a description of each method and technique used in conduct of the analysis. Include a description of assumptions made for each analysis and the qualitative or quantitative data used.
c. Hazard analysis results. Contents and formats may vary according to the individual requirements of the program and methods and techniques used. As applicable, analysis results should be captured in the Hazard Tracking System (HTS). Ensure the results include a complete list of warnings, cautions, and procedures required in operating and maintenance manuals and for training courses.
206.3 Details to be specified. The Request for Proposal (RFP) and Statement of Work (SOW) shall include the following, as applicable:
a. Imposition of Task 206. (R)
b. Identification of functional discipline(s) to be addressed by this task. (R)
c. Minimum reporting requirements. (R)
d. Desired analysis methodologies and technique(s) and any special data elements, format, or data reporting requirements (consider Task 106, Hazard Tracking System).
e. Selected hazards, hazardous areas, or other specific items to be examined or excluded.
f. COTS, GOTS, NDI, and GFE technical data to enable the contractor to accomplish the defined task.
g. Legacy and related processes and equipment and associated hazard analyses to be reviewed.
h. How information reported in this task will be correlated with tasks and analyses that may provide related information, such as Task 207 (Health Hazard Analysis).
i. Concept of operations.
j. Other specific hazard management requirements, e.g., specific risk definitions and matrix to be used on this program.
Forward to the next excerpt: Task 207